Friday, August 8, 2008

Strategic Spot Starters: Strategy Edition

Yes, the title of this joke is a testament to my sense of humor rather than my poor titling skills. Ideally, this would have been a short post, but after further thought it's obvious that spot starting can make or break a week and deserves at least some serious contemplation. So lets get right to it, in a format that you might recognize...

Monday: You could make a very good argument that spot starting doesn't make sense on the first day of the week. That's true if you reserve the technique to playing catchup, which for some matchups is a fair reservation. How can you tell if your current week is one of those weeks?
  • It doesn't need to be Friday before you know you've fallen back. Look at your matchups, and then look at your opponents. Sure, most league's don't let you look at future lineups of your opponent, but you should at least respect them enough to assume they won't miss a start. If they have a total of 12 GS and you're looking at 7, you're already playing catchup.
  • Are their pitchers simply better than yours? A lot of researchers (such as yourself, as designated by simply reading a blog on your pastime) abide by the "offense first" rule of drafting. For some teams--like Pete's, just ask him--you simply have a ramshackle pitching core. If you're only prayer is to win quantitative stats such as W's and K's, you might as well throw out as many pitchers as possible.
  • If you're facing a team you're most likely going to beat, don't bother. It's not worth the add nor the risk. It's easier to predict victories based on offense, so just compare your starting lineups.
  • Then again, if the matchup looks like its going to be close, be prepared to add early. An early lead in wins and K's puts pressure on your opponent to make hasty decisions; just where you want him. And if it's an important matchup for your season, it's better to overplay than underplay. Winning almost every category could be devastating, while losing ERA and WHIP isn't going to cost you the league.
So what additions make sense? Guys that have a good chance to win are probably the best bets. Most guys with decent strikeout rates are owned unless their peripherals are so bad that they aren't worth the risk, neither to own or to stream. The Tim Wakefield's and Aaron Cook's of the world win this day, and the next.
Tuesday: Yes, Tuesday and Monday are pretty much the same deal, especially given the limited gameplay on Mondays. I think the only important distinction about Tuesday is that you cannot worry about the current score in H2H weekly matchups. I've been down 2-12 and eventually won 12-2, it's simply not the end of the world.
Wednesday and Thursday: Here is where everything comes together. I would add a pitcher out of desperation as soon as Wednesday, but would also continue to pressure my opponent if I had a lead. Wednesdays, and Thursdays for that matter, give you an opportunity to win or lose the week. Before this, you cannot win (but would struggle outright losing), while afterward it's going to take some brilliance to win while losing is probably a sunk cost. Consider everyone available and weigh their possible contributions.
Friday: Peripherals, except in very heated matchups, don't change much once the real weekend starts. Friday is probably your last chance to make a move on ERA and WHIP. Don't hesitate to steal a strong option from your opponent, as the gain is doubled by their lost opportunity. And if you've fallen behind, start streaming for W's and K's to salvage close to half the conventional pitching categories. Sure, New York at Detroit has an over-under combined score of twenty, but if you think Mike Mussina will give up seven to Verlander's eight, it's better than nothing.
Saturday and Sunday: If you've given up on peripherals, nothing changes. But if you have leads in most pitching categories, you have to watch your opponent. In the average week a pitching category was decided by three or four starts, and if they pick out three great ones on the weekend while you're ace chose an inopportune time to blow up, the tides have turned. On weekends and during important matchups, I never let my opponent start more than one additional pitcher each day than I am, they just have too much upside. That said, you have to have been the one to strike first, getting the ideal spot starter and leaving them to choose between John Lannan or Homer Bailey. 

Labels:

8 Comments:

Blogger Zachary Piso said...

Please comment on this one guys, since it was a pseudo-stream of consciousness narrative of the inner workings of my fantasy baseball addiction.

August 8, 2008 10:59 AM  
Blogger Wesley Warren said...

Great thoughts, and a lot of strategies that I've (through much trial and error) have come to employ.

One other thought - what do you all think the ethics of adding and instantly dropping a pitcher you think your opponent might take advantage of, just so that he'll then be unavailable waiting to clear waivers for a couple days...? It could be seen as taking advantage of the system, but I only ever do it in a real hour of need.

Since I've started spot starting in my league, most my other opponents have started doing it. I've even encouraged the tactic with them (we all play softball together, so we get together a lot). Mainly because most of them don't do it right(they don't follow the tenets of this article, in other words). They jump to a quick deficit in the ERA & WHIP categories. This allows me to just play it safe and even take the occasional chance or two in order to stay competitive in K's, W's, and saves, knowing that a bad performance won't bring my ERA or WHIP below my opponents.

But I have Hamels and Santana (both of them, actually) - and their penchant for "no decisions" can really kill me. So the advice of starting pitchers who can do nothing more than pick up a win has helped me overcome those "no decisions."

So Zachary, why the picture of Gio? Where does he fall within the strategies you've outlined?

August 8, 2008 12:14 PM  
Blogger Zachary Piso said...

Ha, well I've fallen in love with the A's pitching staff, especially in the coming years, and I was wondering who would know their faces well enough to identify the future lefty ace. Just think; Gio, Sean Gallagher, Dana Eveland, and Greg Smith + whoever else they decide to employ. Probably the cheapest staff to ever lead a team to the playoffs when it happens?

I see no ethical dilemma for adding and dropping a player, though my ESPN league doesn't put a player into waiver if he isn't owned for the entire day. Yes, its a rather sneaky technique, but its a technique available to everyone in the league. Also, there is a cost, given that player adds are limited and then represent an opportunity cost.

Hence, it's probably wise to have a player enter waivers only if he's owned for an entire day, and at least have a limit on the number of adds a team has. A limit of between 70 and 80 moves a year has been in the back of my mind without compromising the efficacy of spot starting.

August 8, 2008 12:50 PM  
Anonymous Evan said...

yahoo is the same, i thought about doing it to my other owners but its just a waste of time, there are usually enough pitchers out there.
are you going to add some names to this post?

August 8, 2008 1:16 PM  
Blogger Zachary Piso said...

I could add anything though I'm not sure I know what you mean. The week and weekend editions feature individual players, and I find it kind of strange to include specific names in a general strategy article since spot starting shouldn't consistently feature the same player (or they'd be rostered). However, I'll try to address your request if you let me know how.

August 8, 2008 1:20 PM  
Blogger Zachary Piso said...

I could add anything though I'm not sure I know what you mean. The week and weekend editions feature individual players, and I find it kind of strange to include specific names in a general strategy article since spot starting shouldn't consistently feature the same player (or they'd be rostered). However, I'll try to address your request if you let me know how.

August 8, 2008 1:20 PM  
Blogger Wesley Warren said...

I like to consider a nice little group of pitchers frequently on the waiver wire (Wakefield, Eveland, Sonnenstine, etc.) as my "extended roster." If only I had room on my roster for any of them I'd definitely keep them.

August 8, 2008 4:55 PM  
Anonymous evan said...

oh wups nevermind i missed the weekend edition, got it now

August 9, 2008 1:43 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home





Untitled 1
   
  About Us - Contact - Advertising - Privacy Policy - Copyright Disclaimer
Copyright © 2008 Front Office Sports Enterprise. All Rights Reserved.